<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3.0 beta 3 memory usage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.406notacceptable.com/internet/firefox-30-beta-3-memory-usage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.406notacceptable.com/internet/firefox-30-beta-3-memory-usage/</link>
	<description>406 Not Acceptable, not just an error message, but now a blog!</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 00:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: If you could Only Choose Four Firefox Extensions &#124; 406 Not Acceptable</title>
		<link>http://www.406notacceptable.com/internet/firefox-30-beta-3-memory-usage/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>If you could Only Choose Four Firefox Extensions &#124; 406 Not Acceptable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 17:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.406notacceptable.com/internet/firefox-30-beta-3-memory-usage/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>[...] It seems to be a widely known face that the real strength behind Mozilla&#8217;s Firefox browser is in the wide range of extensions available. Whilst Opera might have more core functionality, Firefox has the potential to be the superior browser, especially now the memory issue is fixed. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It seems to be a widely known face that the real strength behind Mozilla&#8217;s Firefox browser is in the wide range of <a href="http://www.406notacceptable.com/category/firefox-extensions/" >extensions</a> available. Whilst Opera might have more core functionality, Firefox has the potential to be the superior browser, especially now the memory issue is fixed. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bong (JB)</title>
		<link>http://www.406notacceptable.com/internet/firefox-30-beta-3-memory-usage/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Bong (JB)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.406notacceptable.com/internet/firefox-30-beta-3-memory-usage/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>He, he, we know for sure FF2 is a memory hog, we can almost see cobwebs as we wait for it to fire-up. :D

We're waiting for FF3 to get stable so we can dump it's older sibling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He, he, we know for sure FF2 is a memory hog, we can almost see cobwebs as we wait for it to fire-up. <img src='http://www.406notacceptable.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>We&#8217;re waiting for FF3 to get stable so we can dump it&#8217;s older sibling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schubsta</title>
		<link>http://www.406notacceptable.com/internet/firefox-30-beta-3-memory-usage/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Schubsta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.406notacceptable.com/internet/firefox-30-beta-3-memory-usage/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>True, I also noticed an increase in performance when using 3.0. When playing Everquest 2, or games of equal hardware-demands, every byte of ram can make your life easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, I also noticed an increase in performance when using 3.0. When playing Everquest 2, or games of equal hardware-demands, every byte of ram can make your life easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.479 seconds -->
